The reason this fails in -27 as well as -28 is because it has nothing to do with -28, it just got triggered for people by a new eglibc upload, period.
The real bug here is that dpkg has decided that referring to multi-arch:same packages without the :arch suffix is bad, wrong and evil, and eglibc sprinkles "dpkg -L LIBC" and such all over its maintainer scripts without adding an :arch qualifier. I'll look at this tonight when I get off work and commit some fixes, unless someone beats me to it. ... Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120417223821.gb11...@0c3.net
