On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 07:56:23AM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this > > is a minor > > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump. > > Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the reverse-deps > > with ratt[1] or ruby-team/meta[2]? > > > > [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt > > [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta > > > I've run ratt on golang-google-grpc, and 22 packages fail to build out of 127. > I'll go through and try to update and/or fix the failing packages. > > Does this call for a migration, since it affects a lot of packages?
If I am not wrong, the situation is (far) more complicated than just this, sorry I missed highlighting this earlier. IIRC, there was some discussion a while back that just running ratt isn't enough (even for experimental) and that grpc may break things at run-time as well. It also had some entanglement with the protobuf package. I realise I'm speaking at a very surface level so I am adding in Shengjing (zhsj) to the thread and recluse myself from any uploads for this package meanwhile. Best, Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
