When installing the gnome-core metapackage (unstable), I noticed that it unconditionally pulled in iceweasel as a dependency. This seemed odd to me, as Iceweasel is not a GNOME-related package at all and seems to make little if any attempt to even integrate with GNOME.
I found a bug[1] in gnome-core that seemed related to this issue, and seconded the call for removing the iceweasel dependency. The response was that security was the driver for this, and that I should report iceweasel's lack of GNOME support as a bug. 1. Is there any background or conversation the RT had that I can look at to better understand their decision? I can't seem to source anything relevant. 2. I'm thinking the suggestion of reporting iceweasel's lack of GNOME integration as a bug is unreasonable. Anyone think that doing so would have any merit? Thanks, Paul [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689829 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350008642.2720.17.camel@airstream
