Henning Makholm wrote: > No it does not. It only allows changes of license for *binaries*. > > It spells this out loud and clear: > > | When the Program is made available in source code form: > | a) it must be made available under this Agreement; and > | b) a copy of this Agreement must be included with each copy of the > | Program. > > which means that I can *not* distribute snippets of the IBM source > under the GPL, hence can *not* use said snippets in a GPLed project. > Regardless of whether GPL is transitive or not.
Hmm, but it does not say "it must be made available _solely_ under this Agreement". If the licenses are compatible in the first place, then nothing prevents a Contributor from offering it under both licenses. Richard Braakman