On 1/18/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:34:24AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > On 1/18/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 1/18/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:48:11AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > > > Care to post a link to rules of New York? > > > > > > > > It's not up to me. You charged Moglen with offenses, you back it up. > > > > > > In this type of offence it sorta goes the other way around: let Moglen > > > back > > > up some of his fraudulent legal claims like "the GPL is not a contract" > > > ("no > > > need" to upper case disclaimers aside for a moment). > > > > Here's an example. > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/af75f708f55b4f5a > > > > (PTRAVEL is a practicing IP lawyer and litigator) > > So this guy disagrees with Moglen, therefore Moglen is wrong and a fraud, > based on what? His credentials? Moglen is also a practicing IP lawyer as > well as a law professor.
Moglen is a liar. And Stallman too. http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-March/004301.html http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004306.html http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004308.html http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004309.html http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004321.html http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004353.html http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004358.html http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004384.html regards, alexander.