On Thursday 10 May 2007 17:28, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I suggest to only check the topmost changelog entry, as some other tests > > already do aswell if I remember correctly. > > None that I could find, and I couldn't see a way of doing that without > some structural changes, although I could look again.
This was only from the top of my head, so I could be mistaken. > However, it's not correct that only the top-most changelog entries are >relevant. That's true in some cases, and indeed the .changes file might address that. But I wonder whether there will be many more "false positives", i.e. many-year-old changelog entries being flagged, than bugs that are missed in those cases. At least I would see flagging a non-current changelog entry that way as a false positive. What course of action do you suggest? Fix the changelog retroactively? thanks, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]