Your message dated Tue, 06 Feb 2024 16:27:09 +0530
with message-id <be03d48c-99fe-4791-9ac5-9db8721b5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: false positive for Python top_level.txt files:
package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc
has caused the Debian Bug report #1053855,
regarding false positive for Python top_level.txt files:
package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1053855: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053855
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.116.3
Severity: normal
Just building a Python package with this version, and I receive the
info tag:
I: python3-bytecode: package-contains-documentation-outside-usr-share-doc
[usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/bytecode-0.15.0.dist-info/top_level.txt]
I think (almost) every Python package has a top_level.txt file that is
automatically built, naming the top-level Python package, so this file
should be excluded from this test. (The file always lives in a
*.dist-info or *.egg-info directory.)
Best wishes,
Julian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.117.0
This should be fixed in the latest upload. Please re-open if that's not the
case.
On 13 October 2023 10:38:34 am IST, Julian Gilbey <j...@debian.org> wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:18:58AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 patch
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems that .dist-info and .egg-info are always ignored for this
>> warning anyway. However dist-info should contain
>> [...]
>>
>> On digging into dh-python changelog, I see the entry:
>>
>> * Remove RECORD files from dist-info, these are incompatible with
>> multi-arch.
>>
>> Then, I think it makes sense to remove this check from lintian as well.
>>
>> I've anyway opened an MR to fix this:
>>
>> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/482
>
>Amazingly fast deductive work there, Nilesh - thank you!
>
>Best wishes,
>
> Julian
--- End Message ---
