Hi

I am trying to fix the CVE for SALT

Unfortunatly this will need a backport of salt 3002.9 that in turn need:
python3-saltfactories >= 0.907 (that need python3-setuptools (>= 50.3.2),  
python3-setuptools-scm (>= 3.4) to be investigated)
python3-attr (>= 19.1)

I believe the first one used only for test could be solved

For the second one, I think we should not update due to reverse depends

What is the usual guidance in this case ? Can we embed (python3-venv) the 
python3-attr package ?

Is it worthwhile ?

Bastien

[1]
Package: automat
Package: black
Package: cfgrib
Package: dhcpcanon
Package: fiona
Package: magic-wormhole
Package: magic-wormhole-mailbox-server
Package: pytest
Package: python-hypothesis
Package: python-service-identity
Package: python-treq
Package: python-zeep
Package: rasterio
Package: ufolib2

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

  • SALT Bastien Roucariès

Reply via email to