On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:05:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> (Please note: this response is based mostly on the information included in
> your message.  I only looked cursorily at the actual license of Pale Moon
> to confirm that it looks very non-free by our definitions.)
> 

I /believe/ that the redistribution licence is only applicable to the
binaries produced by Pale Moon themselves. However, they do have a
restriction on the trademark, which would make things somewhat more
complicated.

Neil
-- 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to