Given the (lack of) maintenance on the package, I am pretty confident we don't have anyone in Debian that really knows it (I am willing to be pleasantly surprised).
The gtts upload I did migrated to Testing last night, so I'll leave the rest of it to you. Thanks, Scott K On Monday, August 7, 2023 9:27:05 AM EDT Emmanuel Arias wrote: > Hello Scott, > > I don't use it, but seems an interested project. I can work on it, but > it would be great if you have a maintainer that already know the project. > > Cheers, > Emmanuel > > On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 05:23:53PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > The gtts package is, at least nominally, maintained by the Debian Python > > Team, but has no human uploader. As a practical matter, I think someone > > should either adopt it (add themselves to uploaders) or we should > > formally orphan the package so we aren't pretending. > > > > It has two rdepends: > > > > Reverse-Depends > > =============== > > * dialect [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el] > > * mnemosyne > > > > I personally track mnemosyne, even though it's not team maintained, > > because i have an interest in the package. I noticed it was going to be > > removed from Testing because of a FTBFS bug in gtts, so I fixed gtts by > > updating it to the current upstream release. Looking at the upload > > history, it's been this way for awhile. > > > > One consequence of it not being actually maintained is that we released > > bookworm with a non-functional gtts package (see #1030290). If anyone had > > been paying attention to the package, they would have noticed that should > > have been an RC bug (it is now) and it would have either been fixed or > > removed. > > > > The package is now in not awful shape in Unstable (and barring surprises > > Testing later today), but it could still use some work. The major > > immediate task for a potential maintainer would be working with the > > Stable Release Managers to get bookworm fixed. > > > > If you're interested in the package and wiling to watch over it, please > > let me know via email. If I don't hear back, I'll assume no one is > > interested and orphan it in a week or two. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
