Your message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:32:33 +0100
with message-id <49eda68c-9a49-41f0-9975-b95fa491f...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1059929: release.debian.org:
gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency
has caused the Debian Bug report #971739,
regarding release.debian.org: britney thinks ghostscript B-D on libz-dev:native
is unsatisfiable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
971739: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971739
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
The excuses on <https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ghostscript> say:
* ghostscript unsatisfiable Build-Depends(-Arch) on amd64: libz-dev:native
* ghostscript unsatisfiable Build-Depends(-Arch) on arm64: libz-dev:native
(etc.)
(ghostscript's migration is also blocked by FTBFS #971678, but that isn't
the significant thing here.)
However, sbuild successfully satisfies the dependency: libz-dev is a
virtual package provided by zlib1g-dev (only), and sbuild seems to
interpret it as equivalent to zlib1g-dev:native, which is satisfiable.
britney should probably do the same.
I've also opened a ghostscript bug recommending that the B-D should be
swapped to the more canonical form zlib1g-dev:native to work around this.
smcv
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Simon,,
On 05-01-2024 21:57, Paul Gevers wrote:
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On 03-01-2024 20:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 03-01-2024 20:22, Simon McVittie wrote:
I think all of those are correct?
I think that if apt allows you to install it, chances are that it's a
britney2 bug. I'll try to debug it tomorrow.
I have a first proposal for a fix in
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/merge_requests/89
This is pushed, so these two issues should be solved now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
