Your message dated Fri, 3 May 2024 07:26:31 +0200
with message-id <zjr1hwzmfvbhp...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1070271: nmu: 64-bit time_t rebuilds for experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070271,
regarding nmu: 64-bit time_t rebuilds for experimental
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1070271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

The package in sid had a renaming t64 transition, but experimental
already has a different SOVERSION, so only a binNMU is needed.

nmu openmm_8.1.0+dfsg-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
nmu opensubdiv_3.6.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
nmu protobuf_3.25.2-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
nmu opencascade_7.7.1+dfsg1-1~exp2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for 
time_t"


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-05-03 05:20:31 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> The package in sid had a renaming t64 transition, but experimental
> already has a different SOVERSION, so only a binNMU is needed.
> 
> nmu openmm_8.1.0+dfsg-2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
> nmu opensubdiv_3.6.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
> nmu protobuf_3.25.2-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for time_t"
> nmu opencascade_7.7.1+dfsg1-1~exp2 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild for 
> time_t"

Scheduled

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to