On Sun, September 12, 2010 18:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The rubygems1.9.1 package used to be built from the libgems-ruby source > package. But Ruby 1.9.2 broke it, so we decided to switch to using Ruby > 1.9.2's rubygems for 1.9.X. > That requires dropping the 1.9 package from libgems-ruby, and making > changes to the ruby1.9.1 package to add the rubygems files to the > ruby1.9.1 package. (full discussion in #588125) > Additionally, a common complaint from rubygems users was addressed, by > allowing a workaround to do "gem update --system". (Done in both > packages).
Why was this uploaded with an urgency of high? One of the changes in debian/rules isn't mentioned in the changelog: -include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make +include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/patchsys-quilt.mk > Then, ruby1.9.1 1.9.2.0-1. Already unblocked by Luk as part of the "security fixes unblock" set, but aged to 20 days. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/251e4d70436a3b70df1028df63b626c5.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
