Hi Rebecca (2024.01.03_21:27:49_+0000) > pandas and statsmodels are currently using cython3-legacy. I left their > cython 3.0 bugs open when I made this change, as I do want to actually > switch them to cython 3.x at some point. > > These bugs have now been raised to RC. Is this an intentional attempt to > remove cython3-legacy (which seems unlikely as there is no such bug on > cython3-legacy itself), or have they been mistaken for packages that still > depend on plain cython3 but don't build with cython3 3.x (which would be an > active FTBFS and hence RC)? > > If the second, how should such bugs be marked to make them less confusing? > Is removing the usertag enough?
I didn't review the bugs when I raised the severity, I just took everything that was usertagged. Sorry! I'd suggest lowering the severity again. You could add a separate usertag for using cython3-legacy, but we can also see that pretty easily by looking at reverse-depends. Stefano -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ +1 415 683 3272 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
