Hi, uploaded yesterday. Now it is waiting for review in NEW queue.
Best regards Anton Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb Qianqian Fang <fan...@gmail.com>: > On 7/22/20 4:33 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > I currently have "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python" in control and "export > PYBUILD_TEST_ARGS=test/" in rules, the CI pipeline seems to be ok with > autopkgtest for pybj > Ah, OK. I missed it. > > Please fix the binary inclusion (do not forget to rename the tarball then). > > > hi Anton > > I noticed that although the auto-test did run for the pyjdata package, it > reported 0 test. I migrated my test unit to use unittest, and now it runs > properly. > > to make this update, I created a new upstream release (v0.3.6), and > imported it to salsa, see new commits here > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pyjdata/-/commits/master > > let em know if you see anything else worth fixing. > > Qianqian > > > > Best regards > > Anton > > > Am Mi., 22. Juli 2020 um 01:41 Uhr schrieb Qianqian Fang <fan...@gmail.com > >: > >> On 7/21/20 4:39 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: >> >> Hi Qianqian, >> >> some general notes to both packages: >> >> >> thanks, see my below updates >> >> >> - Please go through ALL files and put licenses/copyrights into the >> d/copyright. >> >> done >> >> >> - Remove python2-binaries. This python version is not supported any more. >> >> >> done >> >> >> - Remove all binaries from the code (ods-files) >> >> >> forgive me, what are ods-files? >> >> >> - pysdate - empty clean file is not needed >> >> >> removed. >> >> >> - Add DEP-8 autopkgstests >> >> >> can you point me to an example project how this is done? >> >> I currently have "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-python" in control and "export >> PYBUILD_TEST_ARGS=test/" in rules, the CI pipeline seems to be ok with >> autopkgtest for pybj >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pybj/-/pipelines/158112 >> >> >> for pyjdata, two tests were failed due to the dependency to >> python3-bjdata (which I believe can be fixed once both packages are >> uploaded) >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pyjdata/-/pipelines/158115 >> >> >> Please pay attention, I did not compile and test your packages. Please >> fix all lintian >> errors and warnings, if they exist. >> >> >> most of those should have been fixed, let me know if you see something >> that worth fixing. >> >> thanks >> >> >> Qianqian >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Anton >> >> >> Am Fr., 17. Juli 2020 um 17:34 Uhr schrieb Qianqian Fang < >> fan...@gmail.com>: >> >>> hi Anton >>> >>> just to let you know that I've fixed the numpy-abi error for pybj >>> >>> >>> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pybj/-/commit/818484c1eb462fa1abd80951132a95dcd048641d >>> >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/pybj >>> >>> I also updated pyjdata dependency list: >>> >>> https://mentors.debian.net/package/pyjdata >>> >>> let me know if you have any additional questions regarding these two >>> packages. >>> >>> Qianqian >>> >>> On 7/14/20 6:07 PM, Qianqian Fang wrote: >>> >>> On 7/14/20 5:11 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: >>> >>> Hi. >>> >>> Thanks for your contribution to Debian. I have just some doubts about >>> usefulness for Debian and possible popularity of those two projects. >>> >>> >>> hi Anton >>> >>> thanks for your comment. happy to explain. Changed message title from >>> "JSON/..." to "JData/BJData encoders and decoders" to avoid further >>> confusions. >>> >>> see my self-introduction in a previous thread >>> >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2020/06/msg00006.html >>> >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=fangqq%40gmail.com >>> >>> I am working on packaging a number research software produced from my >>> lab and research projects. I have already submitted 5 octave-related >>> projects, mentored by Rafael Laboissière (CCed) via the Debian Octave >>> Group. I intend to maintain these packages in the future (already doing so >>> for Fedora). >>> >>> These two python modules are part of a bigger project that I initiated >>> last year (http://openjdata.org). They allow python users to read/write >>> JData-annotated data files produced by my MATLAB toolbox JSONLab ( >>> https://github.com/fangq/jsonlab , about 46000 downloads on Matlab file >>> exchange and ~1000 clones/week on github). This work is partly funded by my >>> NIH (National Institute of Health) grants and broader dissemination is part >>> of the project goals. >>> >>> >>> Do you know how many people can be interested in these two libraries? >>> It looks like at least one of them duplicates the functionality of the >>> built-in >>> JSON module. Could you please shortly describe the benefits of both >>> of them before we start to evaluate it technically? >>> >>> >>> The *python-bjdata* project was extended from *python-ubjson* - an >>> existing Debian package. Unfortunately, the UBJSON spec ( >>> http://ubjson.org), despite being broadly used, is no longer actively >>> maintained. I started a fork earlier this year to continue the development >>> of this specification, and python-bjdata is a parser that is compliant to >>> the BJData spec. >>> >>> The jdata/bjdata framework is not a duplication to JSON - instead, it >>> defines a systematic way to encode basic data structures into >>> JSON/UBJSON/BJData serializable forms. >>> >>> The detailed specifications, examples and rationales can be found at >>> >>> http://openjdata.org/wiki/ >>> >>> in a way, the jdata module is similar to *json-tricks* but aimed at a >>> more systematic/standardized way to annotate complex data (such as graphs, >>> maps, ND arrays ...) for sharing, exchange and reuse. >>> >>> https://packages.debian.org/buster/python/python3-json-tricks >>> >>> the bjdata module is a binary JSON format (similar to UBJSON, and >>> msgpack) to store binary and strongly typed hierarchical data. The >>> differences are highlighted in this github tracker >>> >>> https://github.com/ubjson/universal-binary-json/issues/109 >>> >>> Although these two modules were recently developed, we are beginning to >>> integrate those in my other tools including *iso2mesh* >>> <http://iso2mesh.sf.net/>, *jsonlab* <http://openjdata.org/jsonlab> and >>> *mcx* <http://mcx.space/> (~10,000 registered users combined). So >>> packaging and maintaining these tools will greatly facilitate the data >>> exchange among the user communities. >>> >>> let me know if I can provide any additional explanations. >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> Qianqian >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> >>> Anton >>> >>> >>> Am Di., 14. Juli 2020 um 06:35 Uhr schrieb Qianqian Fang < >>> fan...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Dear Science team, >>>> >>>> I just submitted two python module packages and wonder if anyone is >>>> willing to take a look and sponsor these packages >>>> >>>> The python-jdata and python-bjdata packages aim to enable sharing >>>> python >>>> data with other programming environments (like MATLAB, C/C++) via >>>> JSON/binary JSON encoded data files (i.e. the JData/Binary JData >>>> specifications). >>>> >>>> The RFS and mentors links can be found in the below two links >>>> >>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964993 >>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964994 >>>> >>>> both packaging files can be found at >>>> >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pybj >>>> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pyjdata >>>> >>>> Also need some input on removing the missing-dependency-on-numpy-abi >>>> error. >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> Qianqian >>>> >>>> >>
