On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:08:18AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:34:58AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > And even then, a dist-upgrade would be needed. > > Sorry to be replying to myself. > > Of course, this will also need module-assistant style (and any other) > out-of-tree modules to be rebuilt; I can't remember whether there's ever > been a kernel ABI bump in a stable release before,
sarge has had 3 ABI bumps - one for 2.4, two for 2.6 > but IMO this update > certainly warrants something other than the standard boilerplate in the > advisory. If the ABI change was introduced by the security update I'd agree - but technically it was introduced by 4.0r1 (which includes rebuilds of the various linux-modules- packages). The ABI change is noted in the 4.0r1 announcement. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
