Paul McHale writes: > > > > So, lots of reasons not to use Outlook. I'm curious, why do you > > find it to be the > > best available? What does it offer that, say, Netscape can't do > > with a good IMAP > > server? > > > > Thanks for the reply ! > > The best part of Outlook is it's integration. It works with my Pilot, has a > PIM which is descent. My only complaint is it can't be minimized to the > system tray. For me to try to switch at this point would be very > unpleasant. It's lack of configurability is annoying. Otherwise it does a > decent job. Overall, it is the best bang for the buck. I have looked at > Goldmine and ACT!. Outlook has the best one stop application. Another > complaint, as I type this email I check the performance monitor and see > Outlook is using just under 10MB of RAM. A little steep for a program that > must stay open ... > > paul
Real men use VM under XEmacs. That's integration. ( This is declared war i think ;-) ) -- ______________________________________________________ Felipe Alvarez Harnecker. QlSoftware. Tel. 09.874.60.17 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Potenciado por Ql/Linux http://www.qlsoft.cl ______________________________________________________