On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, dman wrote: > No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some > time.
Used to have the email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my tech IDs were 4263G and 6918B, before and after the Beaverton office moved. > You can't claim that he didn't see what he saw. You did notice > that he didn't say *you* in particular were proud, just that all the > outlook users he's worked with were. Thinking back, I remember one Outlook user who was clueful, and he was giving us a heads-up about a server that had *just* crashed (one of the ancient NT machines in Illinois someone missed in the migration to Solaris, if I remember correctly). -- Baloo