On 17 October 2014 13:27, Matthias Urlichs <matth...@urlichs.de> wrote:
> If it passes (which I consider to be sufficiently unlikely to wonder why
> the *censored* Ian even bothered, but whatever), _then_ these lists are the
> right places to discuss the implications. Until then, let's keep it here.

>From the discussion so far (and please correct me if I am wrong) the
only implication of this passing would be that a failure of
init-system-neutrality would now be a serious bug.

It appears that with systemd-shim this bug is now fixed for Gnome (any
other packages depending on libpam-systemd to get logind
functionality). So this should not be a blocker for jessie release.

I am not aware of any other issues that could impact this release
stemming from this.
-- 
Best regards,
    Aigars Mahinovs        mailto:aigar...@debian.org
  #--------------------------------------------------------------#
 | .''`.    Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)            |
 | : :' :   Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv)     |
 | `. `'    Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting   |
 |   `-                                 (http://www.aiteki.com) |
 #--------------------------------------------------------------#


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CABpYwDXgCUNjay8=r=drdq6xkzhln-pwh8_c2y8anrrffye...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to