Alan: > I don't see a mention in this case of GDM replacing dtlogin as the > default login screen, and EOL'ing dtlogin - is that going to be > handled by this case or are you going to bring LSARC 2005/417 back > again to do that at the same time as this case integrates?
I would prefer to handle the EOL'ing of dtlogin as a separate case. The added complexities of EOL'ing dtlogin caused the LSARC 2005/417 to derail, and I would prefer for that to not happen again. Brian
