Targetting 22.04 there now as we would like to have webp support enabled by default also in the LTS.
@MIR team, could you review the request of promoting the package also in 22.04? The exact same version that was promoted in Kinetic has been SRUed to the LTS, https://launchpad.net/bugs/1993789 If/when the promotion is validated we will work on SRUing an eog update pulling webp-pixbuf-loader by default (depends or recommends) ** Also affects: webp-pixbuf-loader (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to webp-pixbuf-loader in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979121 Title: [MIR] webp-pixbuf-loader Status in webp-pixbuf-loader package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in webp-pixbuf-loader source package in Jammy: New Bug description: [Availability] The package webp-pixbuf-loader is already in Ubuntu universe. The package webp-pixbuf-loader build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architetcures: amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el riscv64 s390x is failing tests in which seems a big endian issue, reported upstream https://github.com/aruiz/webp-pixbuf-loader/issues/39 Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webp-pixbuf-loader [Rationale] - The package webp-pixbuf-loader is required in Ubuntu main to be able to open webp image from the standard viewer (eog) and get thumbnails in the filemanage - The package webp-pixbuf-loader will generally be useful for a large part of our user base - The package webp-pixbuf-loader is required in Ubuntu main no later than aug 25 due to feature freeze [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024) - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is new in Debian/Ubuntu and has currently no bug reported - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpadlibrarian.net/607631911/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-amd64.webp-pixbuf-loader_0.0.5-2_BUILDING.txt.gz - The package does not run an autopkgtest because image loaders aren't easy to verify in that setup, but we will open example webp files as a manual testcase before doing package updates. [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - the package is in sync with Debian and has a valid maintainer definition - The package displays no lintian warnings - Please link to a recent build log of the package https://launchpadlibrarian.net/607631911/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-amd64.webp-pixbuf-loader_0.0.5-2_BUILDING.txt.gz - Lintian overrides are not present [Maintenance/Owner] - Owning Team will be desktop-packages - Team is already subscribed to the package - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last test rebuild [Background information] The Package description explains the package well Upstream Name is webp-pixbuf-loader Link to upstream project https://github.com/aruiz/webp-pixbuf-loader/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webp-pixbuf-loader/+bug/1979121/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
