Thanks for the updates. For disclaimer: it is your first release, so it is likely something is off (for example, you have a dependency that is not compatible with Apache license and normally will not be possible to release with) it is just easier to get through the process. The community can decide if you want to go this route or not.
For OpenCypher - if it is a public spec from OpenCypher, it will be best not to include a file but link to it. Even if license compatible it is best not to include files, source code etc from another project because then proper attribution should be there (typically in the LICENSE or NOTICE file) See bundled dependencies here https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html ________________________________ From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 7:32 AM To: dev@age.apache.org Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE Hi Felix, I just want to mention some points. 1-I did update the svn with new files. The unzipping to different names is fixed now. 2-I also removed the md5 file and KEYS file from the svn and source distribution. 3-As I mentioned before the OpenCypher is based on Apache License and it is included. 4-Regarding the DISCLAIMER-WIP: We do not have any tasks to do or tasks pending and not sure if we have to go by DISCLAIMER-WIP. What is your advice? All the licenses are there and I do not have anything for pending tasks so I am not sure if we should use Standard or Work in Progress disclaimer. Please advise. We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. Best regards, On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > ________________________________ > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2021 6:30:04 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > Thank you very much, Flex. I appreciate the feedback. > >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and > >ask everyone to vote? > > > On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > > just the mentor. > > > > A good vote thread might be like: > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html > > > > 1. md5 - should not include > >I will remove this file. > > > > 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz unpack into a > > apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.zip > > and that unpack into __MACOSX/apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src/ > > This is very strange. please check the tar.gz file. > > > >I am not sure why this happened but I will take care of it and make sure it > >is consistent. > > > > 3. > > I'd suggest use DISCLAIMER-WIP > > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#choice_of_disclaimers > >Any specific reason why not using Standard Disclaimer? > > > > 4. > > openCypher/openCypher9.pdf > > maybe don't include this in the source? where is the file from? is there a > > possible licensing issue? > > > >It won't be any licensing issue since OpenCypher is based on Apache License > >as well which is included in the licensing file. > > 5, > > KEYS.txt > > don't include inside the source distribution - this should not be in git > > repo > > I will remove this as well. > > > >Thank you again and please advise if you have any other suggestions or > >thoughts. > > ________________________________ > > > > From: Eya Badal <e...@apache.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:00:26 PM > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > Subject: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE > > > > Dear Mentors, > > > > We prepared the first Apache release and it is available now on the > > following link: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/age/ > > > > Could you please review and approve. > > > > Best regards, > > Eya > > >
