On "support"- Think you said it - In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases, and should not be considered as such.
Should be clear nightly builds should not be on DockerHub, etc ________________________________ From: Josh Innis <joshin...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 8:08:30 AM To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence The community should have a discussion about the need for a docker image of AGE Viewer before we vote on it. A docker image of AGE Viewer will ease the adoption of AGE for graph related problems. It makes it so that a user of AGE Viewer does not have to have intimate knowledge of: Postgres, AGE, NodeJs and React before they can get all the components to work together. I think having a docker image of AGE-Viewer is a great idea. In reference to the links: Docker is not a replacement for Apache releases, and should not be considered as such. What support model do you think is going to be needed for this? Giving people a method of visualizing their data in the most convenient way possible seems to be a good idea, but what do you think are the drawbacks of this decision? On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:32 AM Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I’d suggest the community to have a discussion of the need. What support > model that will be etc. > > Mentor “vote” is more a proxy of having a clear understanding in the > community. > > > ________________________________ > From: Joe Fagan <joe.fa...@bitnine.net> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:14:42 PM > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS and VOTE] AGEViewer dockerhub presence > > Hi all, please vote to utilise dockerhub as a distribution method for > Viewer as it is for AGE > > @Felix > > The direction from Infra team on the incubator AGE dockerhub request was... > "Neither of these threads expressly confirm the project's desire to adopt > DockerHub distribution, they are just discussions about issues related to > it. Please have your project mentors evaluate and approve the requested > distribution method." > > Can I ask you to either vote, or evaluate and approve the > dockerhub distribution method for Viewer too, whichever is most > appropriate, or give further specific advice. > > Thanks > Joe > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 at 05:59, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > I guess I’m linking to myself. I see infra asks for mentor, but as a > > community you should just have a vote. You can explicitly ask a mentor to > > vote too > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/oxzo04gxxkqvmtw7rmzkw8t2d8cf3nwo > > ________________________________ > > From: Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> > > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 9:51:05 PM > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence > > > > Shouldn’t this be a vote? > > > > Please see > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/INFRA-22356 > > ________________________________ > > From: Joe Fagan <joe.fa...@bitnine.net> > > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 7:34:36 AM > > To: dev@age.apache.org <dev@age.apache.org> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] AGEViewer dockerhub presence > > > > Dear mentors, > > > > We would like to have an image for Incubator AGE Viewer at > hub.docker.com. > > Is it possible to approve the creation of > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/age-viewer > > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/ageviewer> > > > > We will not require push access to this and can instead use automated > build > > based on tags in the https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer > > repository. > > > > Once we have your approval we will raise a ticket on JIRA to the Infra > Team > > with the relevant details. > > > > Thank you > > Joe > > >
