I tally 9 +1 to change to default reply-all semantics, and one +/-0 ENOCARE vote. No votes against.
Jeff, would you care to execute the decision with a jira ticket for apmail, or would you like me to execute? Cheers, Bill On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > I know we are facing an org-wide change of MLA's, but > in the meantime... > > It's been debated a number of times in the past (far, long > distant past) but @apr lists operate disjointly with other > projects, httpd for certain, unknown how subversion is > currently configured. > > At least three significant replies in the past few weeks > landed in the personal email space that were meant for > the list. If we respond to a list-post, I expect to reply > to the list, although I understand the caution that one > might intend to reply directly to the poster. That breaks > the spirit of collaborative discussion and should be the > alternate, not the default choice. > > So I'll ask this once more for the first time in 10 years... > > [ ] Keep reply-to-poster default reply semantics > [ ] Change to reply-to-list default reply semantics > > Operational choice, not an implementation debate, > therefore not subject to vetoes... please chime in... > >