I have just reported this issue at the TravisCI forum.

https://travis-ci.community/t/s390x-jobs-have-not-been-almost-executed/10581

Regards,
Kazuaki Ishizaki,

Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote on 2020/11/16 10:02:18:

> From: Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com>
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Date: 2020/11/16 10:02
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Travis CI jobs gummed up on Arrow PRs?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > 1. Is anyone else knows about these failures?
> 
> "these failures" means that the Travis CI jobs aren't ran,
> right? (It doesn't mean that the Travis CI jobs reports
> "failure".)
> 
> This may be a Travis CI bug.
> 
> > 2. Should we look into disabling these checks for PRs that only touch 
rust
> > code? I can do this, but am not sure of the history
> 
> One approach is adding "[travis skip]" to commit message.
> We can't use path based conditional build on Travis CI
> because Travis CI doesn't provide the feature.
> 
> See also:
> 
>   * INVALID URI REMOVED
> 
u=https-3A__docs.travis-2Dci.com_user_conditions-2Dv1&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=b70dG_9wpCdZSkBJahHYQ4IwKMdp2hQM29f-ZCGj9Pg&m=U4B_SrhIun-
> kKemWyzO5XUEZhrCIfFKnR967kBAI3rE&s=iGmV-
> uUdAjCFprWPStYvU1jHvMt7D2YM8hmtdRLC4n4&e= 
>   * INVALID URI REMOVED
> 
u=https-3A__docs.travis-2Dci.com_user_conditions-2Dtesting&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=b70dG_9wpCdZSkBJahHYQ4IwKMdp2hQM29f-ZCGj9Pg&m=U4B_SrhIun-
> 
kKemWyzO5XUEZhrCIfFKnR967kBAI3rE&s=yO4rf79YYHbt8NJKOLGaCKMKUehCe_ub2RtpDLq06QA&e=
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
> 
> In <cafhtnrwxof+5a6jsubeubeq-ulw3skvlfrhfyqr1r7crahv...@mail.gmail.com>
>   "Travis CI jobs gummed up on Arrow PRs?" on Sun, 15 Nov 2020 07:55:27 
-0500,
>   Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> 
> > Sorry if this has already been discussed.
> > 
> > There seems to be something wrong with the Travis CI jobs on some 
Arrow PRs
> > -- for example,
> > INVALID URI REMOVED
> 
u=https-3A__github.com_apache_arrow_pull_8662_checks-3Fcheck-5Frun-5Fid-3D1400052607&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=b70dG_9wpCdZSkBJahHYQ4IwKMdp2hQM29f-ZCGj9Pg&m=U4B_SrhIun-
> kKemWyzO5XUEZhrCIfFKnR967kBAI3rE&s=V6iophseGVoYXwP1pLHBNtuMiHnEjT2bj69-
> iULRCZc&e= .
> > They go into the "pending" state and never seem to actually run.
> > 
> > Since these appear to be checks of the C++ implementation on s390 or 
ARM,
> > which aren't relevant to the Rust implementation, it isn't really 
blocking
> > anything.
> > 
> > I am wondering
> > 1. Is anyone else knows about these failures?
> > 2. Should we look into disabling these checks for PRs that only touch 
rust
> > code? I can do this, but am not sure of the history
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > Andrew
> > 
> > p.s. here is another example of a non rust PR that seems to show the 
same
> > issue:
> > INVALID URI REMOVED
> u=https-3A__github.com_apache_arrow_pull_8647&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg&r=b70dG_9wpCdZSkBJahHYQ4IwKMdp2hQM29f-ZCGj9Pg&m=U4B_SrhIun-
> 
kKemWyzO5XUEZhrCIfFKnR967kBAI3rE&s=lA3pYfzvwvn9bMYt2saPIQe5ZmC11vkGCPO8g6TyMMM&e=
> > 
> > p.p.s. Here is a screenshot showing the travis CI UI for such a gummed 
up
> > test
> > 
> > [image: Screen Shot 2020-11-15 at 7.50.27 AM.png]
> 


Reply via email to