+1 (binding)

I agree we should be explicit about RFC-8259

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:46 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> assuming we explicitly state RFC-8259
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024, at 08:02, Matt Topol wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 5:36 PM Ian Cook <ianmc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> I added a comment in the PR suggesting that we explicitly refer to
> RFC-8259
> >> in CanonicalExtensions.rst.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 1:21 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1, I added a comment to the PR because I think we should recommend
> >> > implementations specifically reject parsing Binary arrays with the
> >> > annotation in-case we want to support non-UTF8 encodings in the future
> >> > (even thought IIRC these aren't really JSON spec compliant).
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 1:24 PM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi all,
> >> > >
> >> > > Following discussions [1][2] and preliminary implementation work (by
> >> > > Pradeep Gollakota) [3] I would like to propose a vote to add
> language
> >> for
> >> > > JSON canonical extension type to CanonicalExtensions.rst as in PR
> [4]
> >> and
> >> > > written below.
> >> > > A draft C++ implementation PR can be seen here [3].
> >> > >
> >> > > [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/p3353oz6lk846pnoq6vk638tjqz2hm1j
> >> > > [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/7xph3476g9rhl9mtqvn804fqf5z8yoo1
> >> > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13901
> >> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41257 <- proposed change
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >> > >
> >> > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> >> > > [ ] +0
> >> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > JSON
> >> > > ====
> >> > >
> >> > > * Extension name: `arrow.json`.
> >> > >
> >> > > * The storage type of this extension is ``StringArray`` or
> >> > >   or ``LargeStringArray`` or ``StringViewArray``.
> >> > >   Only UTF-8 encoded JSON is supported.
> >> > >
> >> > > * Extension type parameters:
> >> > >
> >> > >   This type does not have any parameters.
> >> > >
> >> > > * Description of the serialization:
> >> > >
> >> > >   Metadata is either an empty string or a JSON string with an empty
> >> > object.
> >> > >   In the future, additional fields may be added, but they are not
> >> > required
> >> > >   to interpret the array.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Rok
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to