My current guess is it could because of `computeSelfCost` of
`EnumerableTableFunctionScan`.


-Rui

On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:04 AM Rui Wang <amaliu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello community:
>
> I am stuck an optimizer error while working on Calcite-3272. I am less
> familiar with Calcite's optimizer and struggled to debug the following
> error message. Is there some hints on what direction I should go? I can
> also provide more information if that is helpful.
>
>
>
> > java.sql.SQLException: Error while executing SQL "select * FROM
> TABLE(TUMBLE(TABLE ORDERS, 'ROWTIME', INTERVAL '1' MINUTE))": There are not
> enough rules to produce a node with desired properties:
> convention=ENUMERABLE, sort=[]. All the inputs have relevant nodes, however
> the cost is still infinite.
> > Root: rel#26:Subset#2.ENUMERABLE.[]
> > Original rel:
> > LogicalProject(ROWTIME=[$0], ID=[$1], PRODUCT=[$2], UNITS=[$3],
> wstart=[$4], wend=[$5]): rowcount = 100.0, cumulative cost =
> {1.7976931348623157E308 rows, 1.7976931348623157E308 cpu,
> 1.7976931348623157E308 io}, id = 12
> >   LogicalTableFunctionScan(invocation=[TUMBLE($3, 'ROWTIME',
> 60000:INTERVAL MINUTE)], rowType=[RecordType(TIMESTAMP(0) ROWTIME, INTEGER
> ID, VARCHAR(10) PRODUCT, INTEGER UNITS, TIMESTAMP(0) wstart, TIMESTAMP(0)
> wend)]): rowcount = 100.0, cumulative cost = {1.7976931348623157E308 rows,
> 1.7976931348623157E308 cpu, 1.7976931348623157E308 io}, id = 10
> >     LogicalProject(ROWTIME=[$0], ID=[$1], PRODUCT=[$2], UNITS=[$3]):
> rowcount = 100.0, cumulative cost = {200.0 rows, 501.0 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 8
> >       LogicalTableScan(table=[[ORINOCO, ORDERS]]): rowcount = 100.0,
> cumulative cost = {100.0 rows, 101.0 cpu, 0.0 io}, id = 2
>
>
>
> -Rui
>

Reply via email to