I am +1 on separate projects as well, but to Abe's point I don't think it matters now, we had 21 binding votes for CEP-8 which spells this out.
Kind Regards, Brandon On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:24 AM Josh McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 to separate JIRA projects per subproject. Having workflows distinct to > each project is reason enough for me, nevermind the global namespace > pollution that occurs if you pack a bunch of disparate projects together into > one instance. > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024, at 9:11 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > hi folks - sorry to have dropped the ball on responding to this thread. > > My 2 cents are as follows - > > 1. Having a separate JIRA project for each sub-project will add management > overhead. This option, however, allows us to model unique workflows for the > sub-project. > > 2. Managing the sub-project as part of the Cassandra JIRA project would imply > less management overhead but the sub-project would need to conform to the > same workflows. > > I would pick option 1 unless there is a strong reason and desire to manage a > separate Jira project. We can always split out the Java Driver project if > things don't work out. OTOH merging a Jira project is harder. > > Thanks, > > Dinesh > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:45 PM Abe Ratnofsky <a...@aber.io> wrote: > > CEP-8 proposes using separate Jira projects per Cassandra sub-project: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-8%3A+DataStax+Drivers+Donation > > > We suggest distinct Jira projects, one per driver, all to be created. > > I don't see any discussion changing that from the [DISCUSS] or vote threads: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/01pljcncyjyo467l5orh8nf9okrh7oxm > https://lists.apache.org/thread/opt630do09phh7hlt28odztxdv6g58dp > https://lists.apache.org/thread/crolkrhd4y6tt3k4hsy204xomshlcp4p > > But looks like upon acceptance that was changed: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dhov01s8dvvh3882oxhkmmfv4tqdd68o > > > New issues will be tracked under the CASSANDRA project on Apache’s JIRA > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CASSANDRA> under the component > > ‘Client/java-driver’. > > I'm in favor of using the same Jira as Cassandra proper. Committership is > project-wide, so having a standardized process (same ticket flow, review > rules, labels, etc. is beneficial). But multiple votes happened based on the > content of the CEP, so we should stick to what was voted on and move to a > separate Jira. > > -- > Abe > >
