Hi, I am fine with either actually - though more used to jira personally :-) (github issues has a nice integrations with pr's which has been useful though). The main reason why I asked is what Nicholas clarified about - saw a nontrivial number of github issue related mails, and was not sure if we were moving to using that !
Thanks, Mridul On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:52 AM Keyong Zhou <zho...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Mridul, > > Thanks for asking. In fact at the time when donating Celeborn to ASF > incubator we had a discussion whether to use JIRA or > Github for issue tracking and we decided to choose JIRA at last. Seems > different projects have different preferences. Maybe > newer projects tends to use Github. > > To me, I'm actually fine with both. JIRA works well so far, will using > Github be more beneficial? Glad to hear about your opinion. > > Thanks, > Keyong Zhou > > Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> 于2024年2月7日周三 14:03写道： > > > Looks like I am wrong, github issues can be used [1]. > > Is Celeborn planning to use github issues going forward ? > > > > Regards, > > Mridul > > > > > > [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/#issues > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 12:00 AM Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I received a fairly large number of emails to > > > incubator-celeb...@noreply.github.com, which typically are for PR's. > > > They appear to be github issues - are we trying to move to github > issues > > > instead of Apache jira ? IIRC there is a policy to use jira for > tracking > > > bugs/improvements, right ? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Mridul > > > > > >
