This is a bit of a coincidence as I looked into this just today as well. The CNCF is one of the organizations that seems to have taken the Apache CLA: < https://github.com/cncf/cla/pull/3/files#diff-04c6e90faac2675aa89e2176d2eec7d8 >
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > FWIW, I asked this question years ago, and never got a clear answer. I > think they are HJTI (http://drbacchus.com/hjti) but the real answer is > that they do not have a license specified. That said, a LOT of > organizations have taken them and changed a few words, and we're > completely ok with that. > > It's possible that our legal folks have a more rigorous answer. > > On 2/25/20 6:32 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I know this is a strange question, but what license are our ICLA and > CCLA texts available under? > > I am asking because I’m involved in a new Open-Source project which is > licensing it’s stuff under the Apache 2.0 license. The project is organized > under a different freshly founded foundation. I suggested we put in place a > system with ICLAs and CCLAs and thought the Apache ones would work nicely … > unfortunately they don’t have License headers ;-) > > > > Are our documents under Apache 2.0 License too? > > > > Chris > > > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com > http://rcbowen.com/ > @rbowen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >
