In the past we have avoided linking to whimsy in public facing documentation. It encourages people to dig to find what they can find. Whimsy is *not* a place that we want people digging, IMHO, and if there's alternate (there is) we should use it.
On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 19:47 sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 at 00:28, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, 06:10 rlenferink (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > rlenferink commented on code in PR #125: > > > URL: > https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/125#discussion_r1239637617 > > > > > > > > > > > > Review Comment: > > > Great addition! Should we maybe link to > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/ if people want to easily > select > > > another project and have a look at their past reports ? > > > > > > > That's private but yeah I will link to the public version of that. > > $ curl -I https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/ > HTTP/1.1 200 OK > > Looks public to me ... > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org > >
