noting that https://ci-couchdb.apache.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/jenkins-cm1%2FPullRequests/detail/PR-2732/7/pipeline/ now fails because kerl isn't there. related?
B. > On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:11, Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: > > Nice, make check-fdb passes for me on that branch (the 2nd time, the 1st time > was a spurious failure, timing related). > > B. > >> On 30 Mar 2020, at 22:04, Robert Samuel Newson <rnew...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Great timing, I merged something to prototype/fdb-layer without the check >> passing, I'm trying this now. >> >> First note, the kerl line doesn't work but it seems there's a system wide >> erlang 20 install instead. >> >> B. >> >>> On 30 Mar 2020, at 19:50, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi everyone, hope you're all staying at home[1]. >>> >>> I've just pushed out a new version of our >>> couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all Docker image. This now includes the fdb >>> binaries, as well as client libraries and headers. This is a necessary (but >>> not sufficient) step to getting the fdb prototype merged to master. >>> >>> Can someone please test if this works correctly for them to build and test >>> CouchDB (with fdb)? >>> >>> Here's instructions: >>> >>> docker pull couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all >>> docker run -it couchdbdev/debian-buster-erlang-all >>> # then, inside the image: >>> cd >>> git clone https://github.com/apache/couchdb >>> cd couchdb && git checkout <whatever branch you want> >>> . /usr/local/kerl/20.3.8.25/activate >>> # you still need to fix make check, but Paul says this should work: >>> make check-fdb >>> >>> The next step would be to fix `make check`. Then, you can merge the fdb >>> branch to master. >>> >>> CI on master will be broken after fdb merge until we get answers to these >>> questions: [2]. >>> >>> **REMEMBER**: Any 3.x fixes should land on the 3.x branch at this point. If >>> they're backend specific, there's no need for them to land on master >>> anymore. >>> >>> **QUESTION**: Now that we have a new feature (JWT), it's likely the next >>> CouchDB release would be 3.1.0 - so, probably no need to land more fixes on >>> 3.0.x at this point. Does everyone agree? >>> >>> -Joan "I miss restaurants" Touzet >>> >>> [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rORMGH0jE2I >>> [2]: https://forums.foundationdb.org/t/package-download-questions/2037 >> >