+1 (non-binding)
The @Experimental annotation is really missing, Marton could you add it
please?


On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:04 PM Austin Cawley-Edwards <
austin.caw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Márton,
>
> The FLIP looks generally good to me, though could we add the
> `@Experimental` annotation to the proposed interfaces so it is in sync with
> what was agreed in the discussion thread?
>
> Thanks,
> Austin
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 9:40 AM Gyula Fóra <gyf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 from my side
> >
> > This is a good addition that will open many possibilities in the future
> and
> > solve some immediate issues with the current Kerberos integration.
> >
> > Gyula
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 2:50 PM Márton Balassi <balassi.mar...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone, I would like to start a vote on FLIP-181 [1] which was
> > > discussed in this thread [2]. The vote will be open for at least 72
> hours
> > > until July 9th unless there is an objection or not enough votes.
> > >
> > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/CAUBCw
> > > [2]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53b6b8931b6248a849855dad27b1a431e55cdd48ca055910e8f015a8%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to