My preference would be Jenkins. Raul, do you know how to set it up? On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
> Cool! Do you think you can host it at GridGain? > > Else, we could run it as a Jenkins job in the ASF Jenkins. > > Regards, > > *Raúl Kripalani* > PMC & Committer @ Apache Ignite, Apache Camel | Integration, Big Data and > Messaging Engineer > http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > Blog: raul.io | twitter: @raulvk <https://twitter.com/raulvk> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > +1 for Raul, great idea. > > We can also include a column with "days since last update" to see how > long > > each issue has been waiting. > > > > I have some experience with JIRA REST API, so maybe I could help with > this. > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > How about a nightly job that fetches all tickets from JIRA which are > > > unresolved and have Patch Available = true, and (1) sends them to the > dev > > > ML or (2) posts it in Gitter? > > > > > > Will it help raise awareness and put them on the radar? > > > > > > Raúl. > > > On 2 Mar 2016 20:47, "Denis Magda" <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I would better ask contributors to ping committers on the dev list > > when a > > > > patch is available asking for review. > > > > It can happen that committers missed or forgot to do the review and a > > > > contributor can remind them sending one more email to the dev list. > > > > > > > > I don't see anything wrong with this approach. It's an open source > > > project > > > > and most of the people don't keep an eye on new contributions that > have > > > to > > > > be released. > > > > > > > > PATCH_AVAILABLE stat is a right point. But I won't execute this > filter > > > all > > > > the time checking for pending reviews and some of the committers > don't > > > move > > > > the ticket to the CLOSED state when everything is merged. > > > > The latter was discussed some time ago there. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > On 3/2/2016 6:02 PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote: > > > > > > > >> Denis, > > > >> > > > >> We have a special status at Ignite JIRA - PATCH AVAILABLE which > means > > > that > > > >> issue ready to be reviewed. > > > >> Currently 59 issues has such status according to > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-2&jql=project%20%3D%20Ignite%20and%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22 > > > >> > > > >> I think we have to add notes that this status can be used only > during > > > >> waiting of review and we will have no problems with actual "required > > > >> review" list in future. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Roman Shtykh > > <rsht...@yahoo.com.invalid > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I have also asked for review of the following tickets but failed to > > get > > > a > > > >>> feedback. > > > >>> They are not complicated, but I would appreciate a quick review. > > Thank > > > >>> you! > > > >>> > > > >>> [IGNITE-2563] Queries: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when using > > > BOOL_AND > > > >>> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2563 > > > >>> > > > >>> IGNITE-2416 TcpDiscoverySharedFsIpFinder doesn't work with IPv6 > > > addresses > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2416 > > > >>> > > > >>> and a new one > > > >>> > > > >>> IGNITE-2710 Session not unbind from current request after invoking > > > >>> request.getSession().invalidate() > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2710 > > > >>> > > > >>> -Roman > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 6:38 PM, Denis Magda < > > dma...@gridgain.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Ignite committers, > > > >>> > > > >>> There is a number of contributions that have to be reviewed. > > > >>> > > > >>> Please pick them up basing on your experience and provide your > review > > > >>> notes. > > > >>> > > > >>> Ignite 2718: Missing ZookeeperIpFinder dependencies > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2718> > > > >>> IGNITE-2693: withKeepBinary and non-binary marshallers > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2693> > > > >>> IGNITE-2735: Fixes distributed semaphore local node stopping issue. > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2735> > > > >>> *IGNITE-642: Implements cache distributed reentrant lock > > > >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-642> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> *Regards, > > > >>> Denis > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
