Sounds great! ________________________________ From: Xiangdong Huang <saint...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 12:16:18 AM To: dev@iotdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of IoTDB this month?
That's Great! A binary release version is really needed! And, if so, at least users can get iotdb-jdbc jars from Maven central repository... Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> 于2019年3月8日周五 下午3:29写道： > I think that's a good idea, > > I think I might start pre-reviewing the current state ... No need in > listing findings after a RC. > > Chris > > Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen > > ________________________________ > From: Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 8:03:46 AM > To: dev@iotdb.apache.org > Subject: AW: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of > IoTDB this month? > > Hi, > > I think a (first apache) release is a good idea. Especially to allow > people to play around with the artifacts. > > After what I have seen the code quality is good and the main functionality > works well. > > Julian > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > Betreff: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of > IoTDB this month? > Von: 吴晟 Sheng Wu > An: dev ,dev > Cc: > > I think we should try to do a release. At least a preview version. 3 > months are not short time for a new project. > Of source, no rush, just when you think it is ready and make sense. > > > > Sheng Wu > Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin > > From Wu Sheng 's phone. > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: yi xu <xuyith...@126.com> > Date: Fri,Mar 8,2019 11:09 AM > To: dev@iotdb.apache.org <dev@iotdb.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of > IoTDB this month? > > > > Hi, > > Over the last three months, we have improved IoTDB in several ways, such > as code quality, document and read/write performance. So should we release > a normal version to our users since we don’t have a normal version right > now. > > Thanks > XuYi >
