Hi Ismael, Fair point. I will update it.
Thanks, Mayuresh On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Mayuresh, > > Thanks for the KIP. A quick comment before I do a more detailed analysis, > the KIP says: > > `This KIP is a pure addition to existing functionality and does not include > any backward incompatible changes.` > > However, the KIP is proposing the addition of a method to the > PrincipalBuilder pluggable interface, which is not a compatible change. > Existing implementations would no longer compile, for example. It would be > good to make this clear in the KIP. > > Ismael > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Mayuresh Gharat < > gharatmayures...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > We created KIP-111 to propose that Kafka should preserve the Principal > > generated by the PrincipalBuilder while processing the request received > on > > socket channel, on the broker. > > > > Please find the KIP wiki in the link > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage. > action?pageId=67638388. > > We would love to hear your comments and suggestions. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mayuresh > > > -- -Regards, Mayuresh R. Gharat (862) 250-7125
