@Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> - Thoughts on the semantics of simply leaving it as-is, with the extra tombstones? As John put it: "It may be unnecessary to "delete" a non-existant record from a view, but it's never incorrect."
It may not be ideal, but the complexity of eliminating it seems to be high and frankly I don't have any better ideas at the moment. Unless you strongly object, I think we'll have to move forward with it as-is. There is still time to come up with another solution before I *hopefully* get this into 2.4, but in the meantime I'll look to continue on otherwise. Adam On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:57 AM Jan Filipiak <jan.filip...@trivago.com> wrote: > > > On 10.07.2019 06:25, Adam Bellemare wrote: > > In my experience (obviously empirical) it seems that many people just > want > > the ability to join on foreign keys for the sake of handling all the > > relational data in their event streams and extra tombstones don't matter > at > > all. This has been my own experience from our usage of our internal > > implementation at my company, and that of many others who have reached > out > > to me. > > backing this. > >
