Yeah I think I agree with you. +1 (binding) from me.
Guozhang On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:43 AM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hi Guozhang, > > Thanks! I just replied in the discuss thread. I agree with what you're > proposing, but would like to consider it outside the scope of this KIP, if > that's ok with you. > > -John > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:38 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > I left another question regarding Transformer in the DISCUSS thread. > Other > > than that I think this KIP is ready. Thanks! > > > > > > Guozhang > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:01 AM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > Hi Dev, > > > > > > After a good discussion, I'd like to start the vote for KIP-478 > > > (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2SkLBw). > > > > > > The proposal is to deprecate the existing interface > > > org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.Processor<KIn, VIn> in favor of a > > > new one, org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.api.Processor<KIn, VIn, > > > KOut, VOut> that parameterizes both the input and output types. > > > > > > This change enables both the Streams DSL internal code and external > > > Processor API code to improve their type safety and protect themselves > > > from type-level bugs. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -John > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang > > > -- -- Guozhang
