On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Meisam Fathi <meisam.fa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do agree that actor based design is cleaner and more maintainable. But we > had to discard it because it adds more dependencies to Livy.
I've been reading "actor system" as a design pattern, not as introducing a new dependency to Livy. If the document is actually proposing using Akka (instead of just using Akka as an example of an actor system implementation), then I'm a -1 on that. -- Marcelo
