[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16491970#comment-16491970
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-8335:
-------------------------------------
i dont think lucene needs to enforce this. from my perspective its just a
docvalues field. given that lucene doesnt even know the difference between a
integer amd a rloat field, i dont think it should be tracking expert shit for
elasticsearch.
> Do not allow changing soft-deletes field
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8335
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 7.4, master (8.0)
> Reporter: Nhat Nguyen
> Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-8335.patch
>
>
> Today we do not enforce an index to use a single soft-deletes field. A user
> can create an index with one soft-deletes field then open an IW with another
> field or add an index with a different soft-deletes field. This should not be
> allowed and reported the error to users as soon as possible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
