[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16492502#comment-16492502
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-8334:
-------------------------------------
Yeah... I look as much as my time permits, which isn't too much. :( What you
mention is actually what we do: I wrongly thought you removed the public
qualifier from the class (as well as the constructor); looking at the diff only
confused me. LGTM!
> Ensure SR#getSementInfo() returns snapshot
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8334
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8334.patch
>
>
> The SegmentCommitInfo passed to the segment reader is mutated concurrently.
> An instance obtained from SR#getSegmentInfo() might return wrong delete
> counts
> or generation ids. This ensures that the SR will use a clone internally
> while stil
> maintaining the original SI since it's needed inside IW for maintainance
> like
> accessing pooled readers etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
