I forgot that I needed to push this myself. I pushed this to master.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 06:19:56PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I misunderstood. Thanks, I'm happy with it as is then. > On Apr 15, 2013 5:17 PM, "Andy Zhou" <az...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > This patch does the way you recommended already. > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:56:52PM -0700, Andy Zhou wrote: > >> > sparse support seems to be broken on some recent Linux distributions. > >> > For example, ubuntu 12.04 with Linux 3.5 kernel, and Debian latest test > >> > distribution, running Linux 3.2 kernel. > >> > > >> > On both systems that sparse was broken, It was not able find the header > >> files > >> > in the default system include directories. GCC finds them by default. > >> > > >> > This patch adds the required GCC default search path when running > >> sparse. > >> > > >> > Tested on: > >> > > >> > Ubuntu 12.04 - w/ linux 3.5 kernel > >> > Debian-6 March test distribution - w/ linux 3.2 kernel > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com> > >> > >> This approach doesn't make me happy, but after some poking around I > >> can't figure out a better way. > >> > >> One issue to consider: as-is, this adds an extra gcc and sed > >> invocation for every compile (inside ``). That might extend the > >> overall "make" by a second or more. Would you mind measuring the > >> cost? If it is high, then it would be worth doing the gcc and sed > >> invocation just once, at configure time, and then using the results > >> for every "make'. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Ben. > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev