On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:26:03PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> 
> > On Feb 19, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -2433,10 +2442,13 @@ add_cmp_flow(const struct expr *cmp, const struct 
> > simap *ports,
> >  *       caller should remap the conj_id and add the OpenFlow flow with its
> >  *       desired actions.
> >  *
> > - * 'ports' must be a map from strings (presumably names of ports) to 
> > integers.
> > - * Any comparisons against string fields in 'expr' are translated into 
> > integers
> > - * through this map.  A comparison against a string that is not in 'ports' 
> > acts
> > - * like a Boolean "false"; that is, it will always fail to match.  For a 
> > simple
> > + * 'lookup_port' must be a function to map from a port name to a port 
> > number.
> > + * When successful, 'lookup_port' stores the port number into '*portp' and
> > + * returns true; when there is no port by the given name, it returns false.
> > + * 'aux' is passed to 'lookup_port' as auxiliary data.  Any comparisons 
> > against
> > + * string fields in 'expr' are translated into integers through this this
> 
> There's a duplicated "this".
> 
> Acked-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@ovn.org>

Thanks, fixed.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to