Guru,

Any reason why the acked-by doesn’t show up on Patchwork -
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/687913/

Thanks,
Sairam

On 10/27/16, 1:49 PM, "Sairam Venugopal" <vsai...@vmware.com> wrote:

>I thought we had set warnings to be treated as error. Appveyor didn¹t
>catch this one either. Thanks for fixing this.
>
>Acked-by: Sairam Venugopal <vsai...@vmware.com>
>
>
>On 10/27/16, 12:20 PM, "Alin Serdean" <aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com>
>wrote:
>
>>ofpbuf_const_initializer takes only two parameters see:
>>
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_openvswit
>>c
>>h_ovs_blob_master_include_openvswitch_ofpbuf.h-23L96&d=CwIGaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M
>>0
>>X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=Dcruz40PROJ40ROzSpxyQSLw6fcrOWpJgEcEm
>>N
>>R3JEQ&m=hW8JkDjtdjUkx6FWcuFVzuV1QybnJJUmFaqnKtac2xQ&s=2QeOkFwLYxAhyEcQGyK
>>o
>>6GJ8Z8KgavEI1u1sVymnHag&e=
>>
>>the compiler only gives the following warning:
>>
>>lib/netdev-windows.c(229) : warning C4020: 'ofpbuf_const_initializer' :
>>too many actual parameters
>>
>>which in result will put junk data into "ofpbuf b".
>>
>>This patch fixes the initialization.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean <aserd...@cloudbasesolutions.com>
>>---
>> lib/netdev-windows.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/lib/netdev-windows.c b/lib/netdev-windows.c
>>index 3218490..423a00b 100644
>>--- a/lib/netdev-windows.c
>>+++ b/lib/netdev-windows.c
>>@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ netdev_windows_netdev_from_ofpbuf(struct
>>netdev_windows_netdev_info *info,
>> 
>>     netdev_windows_info_init(info);
>> 
>>-    struct ofpbuf b = ofpbuf_const_initializer(&b, buf->data,
>>buf->size);
>>+    struct ofpbuf b = ofpbuf_const_initializer(buf->data, buf->size);
>>     struct nlmsghdr *nlmsg = ofpbuf_try_pull(&b, sizeof *nlmsg);
>>     struct genlmsghdr *genl = ofpbuf_try_pull(&b, sizeof *genl);
>>     struct ovs_header *ovs_header = ofpbuf_try_pull(&b, sizeof
>>*ovs_header);
>>-- 
>>2.9.2.windows.1
>>_______________________________________________
>>dev mailing list
>>dev@openvswitch.org
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__openvswitch.org_mailm
>>a
>>n_listinfo_dev&d=CwIGaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=D
>>c
>>ruz40PROJ40ROzSpxyQSLw6fcrOWpJgEcEmNR3JEQ&m=hW8JkDjtdjUkx6FWcuFVzuV1QybnJ
>>J
>>UmFaqnKtac2xQ&s=2ytbuFMxEgjkrn_32J0RWcRQUSDgjhkggbU5trvf20Q&e=
>
>_______________________________________________
>dev mailing list
>dev@openvswitch.org
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__openvswitch.org_mailma
>n_listinfo_dev&d=CwIGaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=Dc
>ruz40PROJ40ROzSpxyQSLw6fcrOWpJgEcEmNR3JEQ&m=_-l0g8rwmrlE8Ufx_RbepqYhnePTJD
>QmVKjt4xtNu-I&s=tcKKbLgVheb4vDUa05jPwCaEPaz-pTMz9dwfB-3Ec_o&e= 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to