From formal point of view CAN is secondary element. We just need to
solve classpath thing which is affecting Android.
The Transport API for CAN was updated especially for cases where we need
to go over specific hardware. It is a great news if you could utilize it
within your project!
Best,
Łukasz
On 19.01.2022 14:39, Christofer Dutz wrote:
Ooooh ...
this is exciting ...
and I be Lukasz will be happy to hear CAN being used :-)
And thanks for the willingness to prepare a PR ... believe me ... it's great to
know something you did something that's now part of something big ;-)
If you need help with that, please let me know, and I'll do my best to help you
with it.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: 杨 林 <todoub...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2022 14:31
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: 回复: [DISCUSS] Remove commons-beanutils dependency
Hi Chris,
Thank you for reply. The device is used for medical megentic bead transferring.
The schema is Android -> Ethernet to CAN converter -> CANOpen Node … -> CANOpen
Node. It has implemented in PC, now I’m migrating the host node program to Android.
I will try to send PR
Yang Lin
发件人: Christofer Dutz<mailto:christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
发送时间: 2022年1月19日 21:05
收件人: dev@plc4x.apache.org<mailto:dev@plc4x.apache.org>
主题: RE: [DISCUSS] Remove commons-beanutils dependency
HI Yang,
welcome to our little community.
That's interesting feedback. I didn't know about that. But ... Android -> PLC
... would you mind elaborating a tiny bit on the use-case (Just out of curiosity)?
How about you whip up a PR and submit your first PR to the project ... that
would make us even happier than fixing this for you :-)
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: 杨 林 <todoub...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2022 13:54
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Remove commons-beanutils dependency
Hi all,
I’m using plc4j in Android, commons-beanutils is the only thing to obstacle me
to do that ,because Android does not have java.beans.PropertyDescriptor.
org.apache.commons.beanutils.BeanUtils is used only in
org.apache.plc4x.java.spi.configuration.ConfigurationFactory (Line 93 and Line
103). I think It could be replace by simple reflect:
field.setAccessible(true);
if (field.getType() == String.class) {
field.set(instance, valueString);
} else if ((field.getType() == boolean.class) || (field.getType() ==
Boolean.class)) {
field.setBoolean(instance, Boolean.parseBoolean(valueString));
} else if …
Any help?
Yang Lin
