>From output of dependency:tree: [INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:tree (default-cli) @ spark-streaming_2.10 --- [INFO] org.apache.spark:spark-streaming_2.10:jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT INFO] +- org.apache.spark:spark-core_2.10:jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-client:jar:2.4.0:compile ... [INFO] | +- net.java.dev.jets3t:jets3t:jar:0.9.0:compile [INFO] | | +- commons-codec:commons-codec:jar:1.5:compile [INFO] | | +- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:jar:4.1.2:compile [INFO] | | +- org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore:jar:4.1.2:compile
bq. excluding httpclient from spark-streaming dependency in your sbt/maven project This should work. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Tathagata Das <tathagata.das1...@gmail.com> wrote: > If httpClient dependency is coming from Hive, you could build Spark without > Hive. Alternatively, have you tried excluding httpclient from > spark-streaming dependency in your sbt/maven project? > > TD > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote: > > > custom spark builds should not be the answer. at least not if spark ever > > wants to have a vibrant community for spark apps. > > > > spark does support a user-classpath-first option, which would deal with > > some of these issues, but I don't think it works. > > On Sep 4, 2014 9:01 AM, "Felix Garcia Borrego" <fborr...@gilt.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I run into the same issue and apart from the ideas Aniket said, I only > > > could find a nasty workaround. Add my custom > > PoolingClientConnectionManager > > > to my classpath. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24788949/nosuchmethoderror-while-running-aws-s3-client-on-spark-while-javap-shows-otherwi/25488955#25488955 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Dumb question -- are you using a Spark build that includes the > Kinesis > > > > dependency? that build would have resolved conflicts like this for > > > > you. Your app would need to use the same version of the Kinesis > client > > > > SDK, ideally. > > > > > > > > All of these ideas are well-known, yes. In cases of super-common > > > > dependencies like Guava, they are already shaded. This is a > > > > less-common source of conflicts so I don't think http-client is > > > > shaded, especially since it is not used directly by Spark. I think > > > > this is a case of your app conflicting with a third-party dependency? > > > > > > > > I think OSGi is deemed too over the top for things like this. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Aniket Bhatnagar > > > > <aniket.bhatna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I am trying to use Kinesis as source to Spark Streaming and have > run > > > > into a > > > > > dependency issue that can't be resolved without making my own > custom > > > > Spark > > > > > build. The issue is that Spark is transitively dependent > > > > > on org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:jar:4.1.2 (I think because > of > > > > > libfb303 coming from hbase and hive-serde) whereas AWS SDK is > > dependent > > > > > on org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:jar:4.2. When I package and > > run > > > > > Spark Streaming application, I get the following: > > > > > > > > > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.http.impl.conn.DefaultClientConnectionOperator.<init>(Lorg/apache/http/conn/scheme/SchemeRegistry;Lorg/apache/http/conn/DnsResolver;)V > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.http.impl.conn.PoolingClientConnectionManager.createConnectionOperator(PoolingClientConnectionManager.java:140) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.http.impl.conn.PoolingClientConnectionManager.<init>(PoolingClientConnectionManager.java:114) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.http.impl.conn.PoolingClientConnectionManager.<init>(PoolingClientConnectionManager.java:99) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.amazonaws.http.ConnectionManagerFactory.createPoolingClientConnManager(ConnectionManagerFactory.java:29) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.amazonaws.http.HttpClientFactory.createHttpClient(HttpClientFactory.java:97) > > > > > at > > > > > > com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.<init>(AmazonHttpClient.java:181) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.amazonaws.AmazonWebServiceClient.<init>(AmazonWebServiceClient.java:119) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.amazonaws.AmazonWebServiceClient.<init>(AmazonWebServiceClient.java:103) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient.<init>(AmazonKinesisClient.java:136) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisClient.<init>(AmazonKinesisClient.java:117) > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > com.amazonaws.services.kinesis.AmazonKinesisAsyncClient.<init>(AmazonKinesisAsyncClient.java:132) > > > > > > > > > > I can create a custom Spark build with > > > > > org.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient:jar:4.2 included in the > assembly > > > > but I > > > > > was wondering if this is something Spark devs have noticed and are > > > > looking > > > > > to resolve in near releases. Here are my thoughts on this issue: > > > > > > > > > > Containers that allow running custom user code have to often > resolve > > > > > dependency issues in case of conflicts between framework's and user > > > > code's > > > > > dependency. Here is how I have seen some frameworks resolve the > > issue: > > > > > 1. Provide a child-first class loader: Some JEE containers > provided a > > > > > child-first class loader that allowed for loading classes from user > > > code > > > > > first. I don't think this approach completely solves the problem as > > the > > > > > framework is then susceptible to class mismatch errors. > > > > > 2. Fold in all dependencies in a sub-package: This approach > involves > > > > > folding all dependencies in a project specific sub-package (like > > > > > spark.dependencies). This approach is tedious because it involves > > > > building > > > > > custom version of all dependencies (and their transitive > > dependencies) > > > > > 3. Use something like OSGi: Some frameworks has successfully used > > OSGi > > > to > > > > > manage dependencies between the modules. The challenge in this > > approach > > > > is > > > > > to OSGify the framework and hide OSGi complexities from end user. > > > > > > > > > > My personal preference is OSGi (or atleast some support for OSGi) > > but I > > > > > would love to hear what Spark devs are thinking in terms of > resolving > > > the > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Aniket > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
