+1 on this.

> On Jan 17, 2015, at 6:16 PM, Reza Zadeh <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
> 
> LGTM
> 
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hey All,
>> 
>> Just wanted to ping about a minor issue - but one that ends up having
>> consequence given Spark's volume of reviews and commits. As much as
>> possible, I think that we should try and gear towards "Google Style"
>> LGTM on reviews. What I mean by this is that LGTM has the following
>> semantics:
>> 
>> "I know this code well, or I've looked at it close enough to feel
>> confident it should be merged. If there are issues/bugs with this code
>> later on, I feel confident I can help with them."
>> 
>> Here is an alternative semantic:
>> 
>> "Based on what I know about this part of the code, I don't see any
>> show-stopper problems with this patch".
>> 
>> The issue with the latter is that it ultimately erodes the
>> significance of LGTM, since subsequent reviewers need to reason about
>> what the person meant by saying LGTM. In contrast, having strong
>> semantics around LGTM can help streamline reviews a lot, especially as
>> reviewers get more experienced and gain trust from the comittership.
>> 
>> There are several easy ways to give a more limited endorsement of a patch:
>> - "I'm not familiar with this code, but style, etc look good" (general
>> endorsement)
>> - "The build changes in this code LGTM, but I haven't reviewed the
>> rest" (limited LGTM)
>> 
>> If people are okay with this, I might add a short note on the wiki.
>> I'm sending this e-mail first, though, to see whether anyone wants to
>> express agreement or disagreement with this approach.
>> 
>> - Patrick
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to