Just a note, one challenge with the BYOH version might be that users who download that can't run in local mode without also having Hadoop. But if we describe it correctly then hopefully it's okay.
Matei > On Mar 24, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey All, > > For a while we've published binary packages with different Hadoop > client's pre-bundled. We currently have three interfaces to a Hadoop > cluster (a) the HDFS client (b) the YARN client (c) the Hive client. > > Because (a) and (b) are supposed to be backwards compatible > interfaces. My working assumption was that for the most part (modulo > Hive) our packages work with *newer* Hadoop versions. For instance, > our Hadoop 2.4 package should work with HDFS 2.6 and YARN 2.6. > However, I have heard murmurings that these are not compatible in > practice. > > So I have three questions I'd like to put out to the community: > > 1. Have people had difficulty using 2.4 packages with newer Hadoop > versions? If so, what specific incompatibilities have you hit? > 2. Have people had issues using our binary Hadoop packages in general > with commercial or Apache Hadoop distro's, such that you have to build > from source? > 3. How would people feel about publishing a "bring your own Hadoop" > binary, where you are required to point us to a local Hadoop > distribution by setting HADOOP_HOME? This might be better for ensuring > full compatibility: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6511 > > - Patrick > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
