> On 25 Sep 2015, at 19:11, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > - People who ship the assembly with their application. As Matei > suggested (and I agree), that is kinda weird. But currently that is > the easiest way to embed Spark and get, for example, the YARN backend > working. There are ways around that but they are tricky. The code > changes I propose would make that much easier to do without the need > for an assembly.
not wierd if you are bypassing bin/spark > > - People who somehow depend on the layout of the Spark distribution. > Meaning they expect a "lib/" directory with an assembly in there > matching a specific file name pattern. Although I kinda consider that > to be an invalid use case (as in "you're doing it wrong"). well, spark-submit and spark-example shells do something close to this, though primarly as error checking against >1 artifact and classpath confusion --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
