Is the SparkConf effectively a singleton? Could there be a Utils method to
return a clone of the SparkConf?
Cheers
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 at 16:49 Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Oh, my bad. I think I left that from a previous part of the patch and
> forgot to revert it. Will fix.
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
> > in this commit
> >
> > 8301fadd8d269da11e72870b7a889596e3337839
> > Author: Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com>
> > Date: Mon Mar 14 14:27:33 2016 -0700
> > [SPARK-13626][CORE] Avoid duplicate config deprecation warnings.
> >
> > the following change was made
> >
> > -class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends Cloneable with Logging {
> > +class SparkConf private[spark] (loadDefaults: Boolean) extends Cloneable
> > with Logging {
> >
> > i use the constructor new SparkConf(false) to build a SparkConf for our
> > in-house unit tests (where i do not want system properties to change
> meddle
> > with things).
> >
> > is this API change on purpose?
>
>
>
> --
> Marcelo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
>
>
